Broadly, here are some groups of definitions:
* Those that define music as an external, physical fact, for example
"organized sound", or as a specific type of perception;
* Those that label it, according to context, as a social construction or
subjective experience;
* Those that label it as an artistic process or product, with the related
psychological phenomena;
* Those that seek a platonic or quasi-platonic ideal of music which is not
rooted in specifically physical or mental terms, but in a higher truth.
The definition of music as sound with particular characteristics is taken as
a given by psychoacoustics, and is a common one in musicology and performance.
In this view, there are observable patterns to what is broadly labeled music,
and while there are understandable cultural variations, the properties of music
are the properties of sound as perceived and processed by people.
Traditional philosophies define music as tones ordered horizontally (as melodies)
and vertically (as harmonies). Music theory, within this realm, is studied with
the presupposition that music is orderly and often pleasant to hear.
John Cage is the most famous advocate of the idea that anything can be music,
saying, for example, "There is no noise, only sound," though some argue that
this somewhat fascistically imposes the definition on everything. According
to musicologist Jean-Jacques Nattiez (1990 p.47-8,55): "The border between
music and noise is always culturally defined--which implies that, even within
a single society, this border does not always pass through the same place; in
short, there is rarely a consensus.... By all accounts there is no single and
intercultural universal concept defining what music might be."
In support of the view that music is a label for a totality of different aspects
which are culturally constructed. Often a definition of music lists the aspects
or elements that make up music. Molino (1975: 43) argues that, in addition to
a lack of consensus, "any element belonging to the total musical fact can be
isolated, or taken as a strategic variable of musical production." Nattiez gives
as examples Mauricio Kagel's Con Voce [with voice], where a masked trio silently
mimes playing instruments. In this example sound, a common element, is excluded,
while gesture, a less common element, is given primacy.
The platonic ideal of music is currently the least fashionable in the philosophy
of criticism and music, because it is crowded on one side by the physical view -
what is the metasubstance of music made of, if not sound? - and on the other hand
by the constructed view of music - how can one tell the difference between any
metanarrative of music and one which is merely intersubjective? However, its
appeal, finding unexpected mathematical relationships in music, and finding
analogies between music and physics, for example string theory, means that this
view continues to find adherents, including such critics and performers as Charles
Rosen and Edward Rothstein.
In traditional North American Indian cultures music is a part of everyday
life. Chanting and singing accompany religious rites and festivals, and an oral
tradition provides a record of history. The concept of music as a performance
art is as unusual among Indians as it was among the seventeenth-century New
England settlers who also placed music in the context of their religious
observances by chanting psalms in the meetinghouse as an important communal
activity.
By the close of the century, however, psalm singing had become
cacophonous, for worshipers could no longer read the metrical patterns in such
sources as the Bay Psalm Book. Although the "correct" rendering of tunes
was less important than religious fervor, many ministers and musical reformers
supported the teaching of musical notation to restore order in the meetinghouse.
"Regular singing" soon gave rise to the development of singing schools and the
creation of music for secular entertainment.
The revolutionary war saw a flowering of musical creativity: supporters of
the American cause often changed the words of British songs, such as "Yankee
Doodle," to taunt their adversaries. William Billings, a Boston tanner, composed
an anthem called "Chester" that expressed his confidence in the ability of the
new nation to shake off the "iron rods" and "galling chains" of tyranny. The
immediate postrevolutionary cultural climate was one of optimism that Americans
could create their own culture free of English influence. Just as Noah Webster
called for an American language that would serve the needs of an American people,
Billings called for individual American creative voices.
Nevertheless, European influences dominated concert music after the
Revolution. Alexander Reinagle of Philadelphia composed ballad operas on the
English model; Benjamin Carr of New York edited a journal and ran a successful
music business; and Johann Christian Gottlieb Graupner helped found Boston's
Philharmonic Society and the Handel and Haydn Society. James Hewitt of New York
composed a patriotic suite, The Battle of Trenton, which quoted "Yankee
Doodle."
Religious music, which had occasionally deviated from European models with
such American innovations as the fuguing tune, reverted to a more familiar
style. Composers Andrew Law, Samuel Holyoke, and Oliver Holden advocated dignity
in religious music and used melodies by Handel, Haydn, and Mozart for settings
of religious texts. The emphasis on musical propriety continued throughout the
nineteenth century. John Sullivan Dwight, a transcendentalist reformer and
conservative cultural critic, argued that Associationists and other
transcendentalist reformers should learn Handel's Messiah in order to
comprehend their mission. Dwight and other arbiters of good musical taste
believed that popular music, especially military music, was a bad influence on
citizens of the Republic. He felt that the lessons of democracy had to be
learned and that the "right" music would have a salutary influence--good
Beethoven would create better Americans.
Outside of the formal concert realm, Americans created their own music,
sometimes for performance but often as an everyday activity. Stephen Foster's
sentimental art songs were popular with audiences, and pianist and composer
Louis Moreau Gottschalk was idolized prior to the Civil War for his good looks
and astonishing technique. He used North and South American popular tunes in
such works as "Creole Eyes," "Souvenir de Puerto Rico," "The Union" (which
quotes the "Star-Spangled Banner"), "Hail Columbia," and "Yankee Doodle"--all
rendered in a pianistic style reminiscent of the music of Franz Liszt; his "Le
Banjo" imitates banjo strumming and quotes "Camptown Races."
The antebellum period also saw the continued development of African-American
vocal music. Plantation slaves used the call-and-response style to tell stories
in work songs, and individuals sang in the pre-blues style of the field holler.
Music was an integral part of the religious life of slaves, and spirituals such
as "My God Ain't No Lyin' Man" articulated their relationship with their faith.
In the 1850s, the call for an independent American music was heard again,
this time from composer William Henry Fry, whose New York lectures in the early
fifties inspired an interest in the development of an American musical language.
But the drive for cultural independence fell short.
With the coming of the Civil War, marches and sentimental songs that spoke of
home, sweethearts, and mothers became popular. Many of these were printed by
composer-entrepreneurs such as George F. Root, whose Chicago publishing house
was among many that thrived on the middle-class market of households with a
piano in the parlor. By the second half of the century, many successful American
composers had studied in Europe and saw no reason to abandon the romantic style
despite the ongoing arguments for an American music. Three men who earned their
livelihoods as professors--John Knowles Paine at Harvard, Horatio Parker at
Yale, and Edward MacDowell at Columbia--achieved respectability with works that
bore considerable resemblance to similar pieces being composed in Europe at the
time.
By the end of the century, there were major orchestras in New York (the
Philharmonic-Society was founded in 1842), Boston (1881), and Chicago (1891). In
smaller communities, performances by local bands reflected the popular taste for
dances, marches, and symphonic excerpts--a repertoire popularized by John Philip
Sousa. In troupes throughout the country, vaudeville performers combined comedic
episodes, scenes from Shakespeare's plays, dancing, and minstrel songs performed
in black face. In a racially divided society, black vaudeville entertainers like
Bert Williams could command high fees on the stage but could not enter
restaurants near the theaters where they performed.
Concert music and opera were still the province of European, mainly German,
conductors, performers, and managers. But a small group of composers--Henry F.
Gilbert, Arthur Farwell, Charles Wakefield Cadman, and their colleagues--thought
that the tools with which to compose American music lay in African-American
culture, backwoods mountain or hill communities, and Indian tribal villages.
As these "Americanists by quotation" looked for materials to develop, new
currents were stirring among black musicians. The cakewalk dance and the
pianistic style known as ragtime emerged, with highly syncopated rhythms
attractive to composers who thought these varieties of black music could be the
material for a new American concert music. The stage was set for the emergence
of jazz out of the marching-band traditions of New Orleans and its appearance in
works for the concert hall. Debate still raged about whether there was an
American music and what form it should take. But that debate would soon be
subsumed under discussions about the utility of the many varieties of modern
music for creating an American musical expression.